PostHole
Compose Login
You are browsing eu.zone1 in read-only mode. Log in to participate.
rss-bridge 2022-06-21T15:26:54+00:00

A Debate Champion on How to Have More Productive Disagreements at Work

In an ideal world, professional conflicts are settled with thoughtful discussion and collaborative decision-making. But that’s not usually how it works. More typically, you see leaders - or the loudest voices - win out, leaving others resentful. And sometimes people don’t even try to hash out differences of opinion; they’d prefer to avoid a fight. Bo Seo, two-time world champion debater, says we can learn to disagree in healthier, more effective ways that ultimately generate better outcomes for teams, customers, and shareholders. Seo is also the author of the book “Good Arguments: How Debate Teaches us to Listen and Be Heard.”


Share Podcast

[HBR IdeaCast podcast series]

HBR IdeaCast
Episode 863

A Debate Champion on How to Have More Productive Disagreements at Work

Listen | Podcast loading...

###

A conversation about creating a healthy, effective culture of debate in the workplace.

  • Subscribe:

Apple Podcasts

Spotify

RSS

All episodes

Details

Transcript

June 21, 2022

In an ideal world, professional conflicts are settled with thoughtful discussion and collaborative decision-making. But that’s not usually how it works. More typically, you see leaders – or the loudest voices – win out, leaving others resentful. And sometimes people don’t even try to hash out differences of opinion; they’d prefer to avoid a fight. Bo Seo, two-time world champion debater, says we can learn to disagree in healthier, more effective ways that ultimately generate better outcomes for teams, customers, and shareholders. Seo is also the author of the book Good Arguments: How Debate Teaches us to Listen and Be Heard.

  • Subscribe On:

Apple

Spotify

RSS

Latest in this series

All episodes

This article is about DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS

** Follow this topic

** Following

Related Topics:

  • Managing conflicts
  • Receiving feedback

Original source

Reply