PostHole
Compose
Login
Pentagon-Anthropic AI standoff is real-time testing balance of power in future of warfare
The Pentagon clash with Anthropic and Friday's severe response from Trump and Defense Secretary Hegseth highlights a growing war over who controls military AI.
Markets
- Pre-Markets
- U.S. Markets
- Europe Markets
- China Markets
- Asia Markets
- World Markets
- Currencies
- Prediction Markets
- Cryptocurrency
- Futures & Commodities
- Bonds
- Funds & ETFs
Business
- Economy
- Finance
- Health & Science
- Media
- Real Estate
- Energy
- Climate
- Transportation
- Investigations
- Industrials
- Retail
- Wealth
- Sports
- Life
- Small Business
Investing
- Personal Finance
- Fintech
- Financial Advisors
- Options Action
- ETF Street
- Buffett Archive
- Earnings
- Trader Talk
Tech
- Cybersecurity
- AI
- Enterprise
- Internet
- Media
- Mobile
- Social Media
- CNBC Disruptor 50
- Tech Guide
Politics
- White House
- Policy
- Defense
- Congress
- Expanding Opportunity
- Europe Politics
- China Politics
- Asia Politics
- World Politics
Video
- Latest Video
- Full Episodes
- Livestream
- Top Video
- Live Audio
- Europe TV
- Asia TV
- CNBC Podcasts
- CEO Interviews
- Digital Originals
Watchlist
Investing Club
- Trust Portfolio
- Analysis
- Trade Alerts
- Meeting Videos
- Homestretch
- Jim's Columns
- Education
- Subscribe
PRO
- Pro News
- Josh Brown
- Mike Santoli
- Calls of the Day
- My Portfolio
- Livestream
- Full Episodes
- Stock Screener
- Market Forecast
- Options Investing
- Chart Investing
- Subscribe
Livestream
- Make It
select
- USA
- INTL
Livestream
Livestream
Watchlist
Create free account
Markets
Business
Investing
Tech
Politics
Video
Watchlist
Investing Club
PRO
Livestream
Pentagon-Anthropic AI standoff is real-time testing balance of power in future of warfare
WATCH LIVE
Key Points
- The Department of Defense clash with Anthropic over AI is a departure from decades of defense innovation when governments largely defined technological frontiers themselves.
- Public-private partnerships have long supported U.S. defense innovation, from World War II industrial mobilization to modern aerospace and cybersecurity programs, but AI is increasingly concentrated in commercial firms rather than government labs.
- In the short term, companies with scarce AI talent and proprietary models have some leverage, but late on Friday afternoon, President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sent an unequivocal message to Anthropic, ordering every U.S. government agency to "immediately cease" using its technology and with Hegseth telling the Pentagon to designate Anthropic a "supply chain risk," which forces other companies that do business with the military to avoid Anthropic.
[Anthropic trying to put limitations on its AI models 'really has no standing', says Brent Sadler]
watch now
VIDEO10:2410:24
Anthropic trying to put limitations on its AI models 'really has no standing', says Brent Sadler
The Department of Defense's clash with Anthropic over the integration of artificial intelligence into military operations, and who sets the limits on usage, reached a peak this week with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth giving the AI company until 5:01 p.m. ET Friday to cede to the government's demands. Anthropic didn't budge, and shortly after 5pm, Hegseth made the break official in a post on X, declaring that "Anthropic's stance is fundamentally incompatible with American principles" and as a result its relationship with the United States Armed Forces and the federal government permanently altered.
Hegseth directed the Pentagon to designate Anthropic a "supply-chain risk to national security," which he said means no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic — Anthropic said in its own statement Hegseth has no statutory authority to mandate such a policy outside military work, and it planned to challenge the designation in court.
It was a severe though not unexpected response that came amid a wider "blacklisting" of Anthropic in government systems announced by President Trump. In the broader context, the battle between military and industry over AI is just getting started. The Pentagon is colliding with the private companies that control AI in a way that has not been tested in the post-World War II era. On Thursday, Anthropic refused Hegseth's demand to loosen certain safeguards of its models for military use, including mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons, because it violates company policies, though the Pentagon said the technology must be available to support "all lawful uses."
"It is the Department's prerogative to select contractors most aligned with their vision," Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei wrote in a statement on Thursday. "But given the substantial value that Anthropic's technology provides to our armed forces, we hope they reconsider."
The standoff highlighted the emerging reality that private firms developing frontier AI may seek to set their own limits on how the technology is deployed, even in national security contexts.
In July, the Defense Department awarded contracts worth up to $200 million each to four companies — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Elon Musk's xAI — to prototype frontier AI capabilities tied to U.S. national security priorities. The awards signal how aggressively the Pentagon is moving to bring cutting-edge commercial AI into defense work.
The urgency is reflected in internal Pentagon planning as well. A January 9 memorandum outlining the military's artificial intelligence strategy calls for the U.S. to become an "AI-first" fighting force and to accelerate integration of leading commercial AI models across warfighting, intelligence, and enterprise operations.
"There are no winners in this," Lauren Kahn, a senior research analyst at Georgetown's Center for Security and Emerging Technology, told CNBC in a recent interview about the standoff between the Pentagon and Anthropic. "It leaves a sour taste in everyone's mouth."
What it does do, though, is mark a shift — a departure from decades of defense innovation during which governments themselves controlled the technology as it was created.
"For most of the post–World War II era, the U.S. government defined the frontier of advanced technology," said Rear Admiral Lorin Selby, former chief of naval research and current general partner at Mare Liberum, an investment firm that specializes in maritime technology and infrastructure. "It set the requirements, funded the foundational research, and industry executed against government-driven specifications. From nuclear propulsion to stealth to GPS, the state was the primary engine of discovery, and industry was the integrator and manufacturer."
AI, Selby said, has inverted that model.
"Today the commercial sector is the primary driver of frontier capability. Private capital, global competition, and commercial data scale are advancing AI at a pace that traditional government R&D structures cannot easily replicate. The Department of War is no longer defining the edge of what is technically possible in artificial intelligence — it is adapting to it," he said.
[...]