PostHole
Compose
Login
NASA's Artemis 3 astronauts won't land on the moon after all. 'This is just not the right pathway forward.'
NASA's Artemis 3 astronauts won't land on the moon after all. 'This is just not the right pathway forward.'
published
27 February 2026
This is big news for the Artemis program.
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.
NASA's plan to return humans to the moon has changed.
[An orange rocket with a white top stands against a dynamic sky. A danger sign stands on the left.]
NASA's Artemis 2 moon rocket is seen on the road between the Vehicle Assembly Building and Launch Complex-39B on Jan. 17, 2026. (Image credit: Space.com / Josh Dinner)
In addition, SLS' design will be standardized to streamline production, and the rocket's launch cadence will be shortened from once every three years to once every10 months, if all goes to plan. To accomplish this, NASA plans to bolster its workforce in order to "rebuild core competencies," Isaacman said, "that will directly contribute to NASA's launch cadence."
It's a major shift in the architecture of NASA's Artemis program, which aims to establish a sustained human presence on the moon and in lunar orbit. A recent report from NASA's Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP), however, cast serious doubts on the previous architecture, calling into question the agency's timeline, projected mission safety and the readiness of the Human Landing System (HLS) vehicles that NASA has contracted from private companies to perform lunar landings.
As originally designed, Artemis 3 encompassed a long list of technological firsts, with a heavy dependency on HLS, which the ASAP determined posed "significant risks at the mission level."
[an astronaut on the moon kneels on the right, a list is written on the left.]
First-time Milestones for the Artemis III Mission prior to Feb. 27, 2025. (Image credit: NASA Aerospace Advisory Panel)
"This is just not the right pathway forward," Isaacman said. "Going right to the moon … is not a pathway to success."
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
"We want to reduce complexity to the greatest extent possible," he added. "We want to accelerate manufacturing, pull in the hardware and increase launch rate, which obviously has a direct safety consideration to it as well."
With the new framework, Artemis 3 is drastically simplified, and less dependent on the readiness of a moon lander's ability to actually land on the moon. The development of both private HLS landers chosen by NASA has fallen short of the space agency's hopeful timeline, resulting in impending delays.
NASA contracted SpaceX's Starship to land astronauts on the Artemis 3 and Artemis 4 moon missions. Starship has flown 11 suborbital test flights over the past three years but has yet to notch several critical milestones needed to qualify the spacecraft for lunar landings with astronauts onboard.
NASA picked Blue Origin's Blue Moon spacecraft, meanwhile, to land astronauts on the Artemis 5 moon mission. A Blue Moon pathfinder known as Mark 1 is currently undergoing testing at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.
Before NASA will let either Starship or Blue Moon carry astronauts to the lunar surface, the vehicles will have to demonstrate their ability to transfer and store cryogenic fuels in space, rendezvous and dock with Orion, as well as execute an uncrewed moon landing and successful ascent back to lunar orbit.
Now, NASA plans to use Artemis 3 as a safe proving ground for those procedures in low Earth orbit before entrusting the landers to be 100% successful on their first flights to the moon.
Previous architecture for Artemis 4 used an upgraded version of SLS, called Block 1B, which featured the enhanced Exploration Upper Stage in place of SLS' current Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS). If NASA's launch cadence with SLS remained unchanged, Artemis 4 would have launched sometime around 2030.
Space agency officials are counting on a standardized SLS configuration to shorten the wait time between launches, and are now targeting an Artemis 4 liftoff in 2028 as the program's first crewed lunar landing, with the potential for Artemis 5 to repeat the feat later that same year.
"I think what we're doing is directly in line with what ASAP asked us to do," Isaacman told Space.com during Friday's briefing. "I think it should be incredibly obvious you don't go from one uncrewed launch of Orion and SLS, wait three years, go around the moon, wait three years and land on it."
Isaacman compared the need for an increased SLS launch cadence to the United States' first lunar program, saying, "There has to be a better way, in line with our history."
"We did not just jump right to Apollo 11. We did it through Mercury, Gemini and lots of Apollo missions with the launch cadence every three months," Isaacman said. "We shouldn't be comfortable with the current cadence. We should be getting back to basics and doing what we know works."
In the meantime, teams at NASA's Kennedy Space Center continue to work toward an April launch date for Artemis 2, despite its recent relocation from the pad at Launch Complex-39B to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) for repairs.
[...]